🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I wish he does so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.